Beyond surreal - Sharon's dick on our nuke trigger
Beyond Surreal - Sharon’s dick on our nuke trigger
This will quickly become "yesterday's news confluence." No matter. WHenever the archives of Amenti are summoned, this will be There.
*****.
What the chimp says...
“The images we see on television are a grim reminder that the enemies of freedom in Iraq are ruthless killers with no regard for human life," Bush said in his weekly radio address. Saturday, June 25, 2005
HOW THE NEWS READS ....
The images referred to appeared under Yahoo news headline “Iraq Violence Overshadows Diplomatic initiative,” were pictures of “Persistant violence that killed at least 32 people and wounded dozens more”, climaxing the bloodiest two days since Falluja, reports said.
Also: “Iran is ‘Out of Step’ with region: U.S. State Department…(says) after hardliner Muhmood Ahmaninejed won presidential election condemned in Washington as flawed.” Looks like Reagan’s secret strategy of reaching out to moderates in Iran while playing hard-line at home, has finally come around full circle with a bucket of nukes slopped back in “Washington”’ – Rove/Bush/Guckert/Shiavo/Pat Robert’s “Washington”’s -- face. Translation: panic time. Shi’ia on the rise. The battle for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people just went south to Tehran. They finally just said No to the BS.
Further: irony of ironies, Rove-Bush squallateers now must deliver the prod the liberal Jews:
http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18822
Jews courted in battle over Bolton
MATTHEW E. BERGER
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
WASHINGTON - The White House is pressing American Jewish organizations to speak out in favor of John Bolton, President Bush's choice for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, as Republicans push for votes to approve him.
Comment posted: There is a double finesse going on. John Bolton is the epitome of what two major groups hate -- true conservative Republicans, for his Zionist neocon war-for-Israel weltshmertz; and liberal Jews, for his right-wing military/industrial anti-liberal social policies. What makes this odd, and takes it beyond irony several steps, is that many in the core of these two groups --- true conservative Republicans, and liberal Jews -- feel the same way toward each other.
We’ve got a true Union-of-Opposites – aka psychotic – situation.
****.
Why add Kansas’ Sen. Roberts to the Poisonous Python butt-boy list? Here’s why:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/25/politics/25bolton.html?pagewanted=print
June 25, 2005
Senate Committee Head Wants Bush to Stand by Bolton
By DOUGLAS JEHL
WASHINGTON, June 24 - The Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Friday that it would be a mistake for the White House to bend further to Democratic demands related to John R. Bolton's handling of intelligence material.
In an interview, the chairman, Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, said he now expected that President Bush would grant a recess appointment to Mr. Bolton, whose nomination as ambassador to the United Nations has been blocked by Senate Democrats for more than a month.
*****.
Looks like he had a little chat with someone in the men’s closet. Maybe a little deep-throating in Rosslyn’s garage told him to flash? Here’s the little gig they hatched:
“Mr. Roberts had sought until now to serve as an intermediary between the White House and Senate Democrats in the matter. But he said he believed that the administration had gone far enough, and that a recess appointment expiring in January 2007 and perhaps renominated after that, would be preferable to the potential security risks of providing Congress with wider access to names in the N.S.A. reports.”
Call this “end run democracy” – end run around democracy, debasing use of the term for its reversal, tyranny of terror. .
Can’t help wondering: What makes that list of names Bolton collected so special that even showing it to the U.S. Senate threatens national security? Does it include pacts with foreign governments (Israel) non-corformable with national interests, and laws? – perhaps compromising American interests and U.S. security? If so, then the Republican Party becomes the official Party of Treason, circumventing all lawful constraints to impose its will by force. It becomes the enemy of America, the world, itself, committed to putting Bolton’s finger near the nukes?
Might as well be Sharon’s dick.
This will quickly become "yesterday's news confluence." No matter. WHenever the archives of Amenti are summoned, this will be There.
*****.
What the chimp says...
“The images we see on television are a grim reminder that the enemies of freedom in Iraq are ruthless killers with no regard for human life," Bush said in his weekly radio address. Saturday, June 25, 2005
HOW THE NEWS READS ....
The images referred to appeared under Yahoo news headline “Iraq Violence Overshadows Diplomatic initiative,” were pictures of “Persistant violence that killed at least 32 people and wounded dozens more”, climaxing the bloodiest two days since Falluja, reports said.
Also: “Iran is ‘Out of Step’ with region: U.S. State Department…(says) after hardliner Muhmood Ahmaninejed won presidential election condemned in Washington as flawed.” Looks like Reagan’s secret strategy of reaching out to moderates in Iran while playing hard-line at home, has finally come around full circle with a bucket of nukes slopped back in “Washington”’ – Rove/Bush/Guckert/Shiavo/Pat Robert’s “Washington”’s -- face. Translation: panic time. Shi’ia on the rise. The battle for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people just went south to Tehran. They finally just said No to the BS.
Further: irony of ironies, Rove-Bush squallateers now must deliver the prod the liberal Jews:
http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18822
Jews courted in battle over Bolton
MATTHEW E. BERGER
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
WASHINGTON - The White House is pressing American Jewish organizations to speak out in favor of John Bolton, President Bush's choice for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, as Republicans push for votes to approve him.
Comment posted: There is a double finesse going on. John Bolton is the epitome of what two major groups hate -- true conservative Republicans, for his Zionist neocon war-for-Israel weltshmertz; and liberal Jews, for his right-wing military/industrial anti-liberal social policies. What makes this odd, and takes it beyond irony several steps, is that many in the core of these two groups --- true conservative Republicans, and liberal Jews -- feel the same way toward each other.
We’ve got a true Union-of-Opposites – aka psychotic – situation.
****.
Why add Kansas’ Sen. Roberts to the Poisonous Python butt-boy list? Here’s why:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/25/politics/25bolton.html?pagewanted=print
June 25, 2005
Senate Committee Head Wants Bush to Stand by Bolton
By DOUGLAS JEHL
WASHINGTON, June 24 - The Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Friday that it would be a mistake for the White House to bend further to Democratic demands related to John R. Bolton's handling of intelligence material.
In an interview, the chairman, Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, said he now expected that President Bush would grant a recess appointment to Mr. Bolton, whose nomination as ambassador to the United Nations has been blocked by Senate Democrats for more than a month.
*****.
Looks like he had a little chat with someone in the men’s closet. Maybe a little deep-throating in Rosslyn’s garage told him to flash? Here’s the little gig they hatched:
“Mr. Roberts had sought until now to serve as an intermediary between the White House and Senate Democrats in the matter. But he said he believed that the administration had gone far enough, and that a recess appointment expiring in January 2007 and perhaps renominated after that, would be preferable to the potential security risks of providing Congress with wider access to names in the N.S.A. reports.”
Call this “end run democracy” – end run around democracy, debasing use of the term for its reversal, tyranny of terror. .
Can’t help wondering: What makes that list of names Bolton collected so special that even showing it to the U.S. Senate threatens national security? Does it include pacts with foreign governments (Israel) non-corformable with national interests, and laws? – perhaps compromising American interests and U.S. security? If so, then the Republican Party becomes the official Party of Treason, circumventing all lawful constraints to impose its will by force. It becomes the enemy of America, the world, itself, committed to putting Bolton’s finger near the nukes?
Might as well be Sharon’s dick.
posted by Sid Thomas | 7:25 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home