No Right to Exist

NO RIGHT TO EXIST
An argument in re Bush supporters

(Preface: not against HL, but following up his remarks..)

Hugh Lincoln – OD Board
http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18925

“…. If there's any group of people not yet ready for a hardcore "us v. them" mindset, it's the vast majority of white Americans. Thus, they will need to have some sort of universalist underpinning for what they're thinking in order for it to be appealing.”
As for the first claim: what of this?

Zogby on Bush polls:

“...In a sign of the continuing partisan division of the nation, more
than
two-in-five (42%) voters say that, if it is found that President Bush
did
not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq,
Congress
should hold him accountable through impeachment “
_____.
I think it says there is a BIG readiness for --- (beyond white supremacy as a national issue – I don’t run away from the term, either, for whoever wants to use it! ..) A UNIVERSALIST REALITY UNDERPINNING – AS IN METAPHYSICAL TALK (about what is vrs. what is not).

NOT JUST IMPEACHMENT FOR BUSH – IMPRISONMENT ON CHARGES OF HIGH CRIMES INCLUDING TREASON, FOR ALL ENNABLERS – THEN THE DEATH PENALTY ARGUED FOR IN COURT OF LAW; JUDGED, SENTENCED, WITH PUBLIC EXECUTIONS.
_____.

http://lists.topica.com/lists/psychohistory/read/message.html?mid=1719103630&sort=d&start=10737



ARGUMENT:

The BIG LIE – Bush’s speech
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=4102

BLOG | Posted 06/29/2005 @ 1:57pm
The Big Lie

John Nichols
"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th attacks."
George W. Bush -- September 17, 2003 ...
To the extend that George Bush had retained the slightest shred of dignity through the whole ugly Iraq imbroglio, it was found in his refusal to fully embrace the biggest of the Big Lies told by his aides: The claim that the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein had played a role in the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. ….
In other words, Bush made at least some effort to avoid echoing
Cheney's Big Lies.

Until now.

On Tuesday night, however, the president abandoned the narrow patch of high ground that he had staked out and dove into the raging flood of deceit that his administration had unleashed.
In what was billed as a major address regarding Iraq, Bush mentioned the September 11 attacks no less than five times.
Before 750 members of the 82nd Airborne Division and the Army's Special Operations unit, who had been assembled at Fort Bragg, N.C., to give Bush a respectful and unquestioning audience, the president declared, "The troops here and across the world are fighting a global war on terror. This war reached our shores on September 11, 2001. The terrorists who attacked us -- and the terrorists we face -- murder in the name of a totalitarian ideology that hates freedom, rejects tolerance and despises all dissent. Their aim is to remake the Middle East in their own grim image of tyranny and oppression, by toppling governments, driving us out of the region and exporting terror."

By suggesting that the invasion and occupation of Iraq should be seen as part of a legitimate and necessary response to September 11, as he clearly did on Tuesday, Bush made a deliberate break with reality -- not so complete a break, perhaps, as that of Cheney and the wingnut faction of the administration, but a break all the same.
The president speech was written and delivered with the intent of deceiving the American people into believing things that were never true.
****

WHAT ZOGBY SAYS 42% OF AMERICANS SUPPORT – IMPEACHMENT FOR BUSH IF HE LIED – IS NOT “IF”. THE ARGUMENT OF THIS BLOG IS “HE DID…JUST NOW” … IN TUESDAY’S SPEECH (6.28), he listed 911 and al-Quida as reasons for war in Iraq. A “deliberate break with reality”, Nichols put it.

This is tagged “The Big Lie” because it is the exact reversal of the truth that would condemn them …. to death, really, if there is any justice, since it is been their side of the reversal of truth all along that has led to all the deaths they have caused. “The exact reversal” means “denied on principle, because it is the reality.” By the same ones who talked, and still talk about imposing democracy. “An oxymoron”, one lawmaker got around to calling it today on TV. Every dire thing anyone tried to tell them was ignored, only what they wanted to hear was listened to (and pipe-lined into their ear-horns), meanwhile pursuing their cruel delusions and insisting that those who don’t go along are negative nay-sayers. Until finally, when it catches with them, reversal of reality in principle -- because it IS the reality -- becomes necessary.

It’s not so unusual. “I didn’t take it; Bin Laden took it and blamed it on me” is all you will ever get from Niggerponte’s Nicaragua Contra supporters, now in control of a chunk of the FBI, probably to follow up on Mark Felt’s and R.P. Hansson’s er, penetrations – or Jew Supremacist Michael Chertov in charge of hellland security -- hell, there has to be money for counter-counter-terrorists, if every terrorist organization has to be infiltrated and vice versa, to get as many counter-s as real-s, and guarantee good Intel, Right? – and counter-counter-counter etc. terrorists from every country, secret service, criminal gang, business escort services and every embassy personnel, all under the control of Reagan Republican Bush Zionists and Vatican-Catholics at the top of Heritage, AIPAC, JINSA, PNAC, AEI …for starters…. America is just a milk cow with soldier boys and girls to protect the skimmers, for them.

Bush laid the theological groundwork for reversing reality in the name of “God” back in ’01. After bait-switching “compassionate” to “faith-based” conservative, as what He Was; and tapping a “GOD’S TROUGH” keg in the US Treasury storehouse, his “initiative” to replace the God America was founded on by Nixon war criminal’s Jailhouse Preacher G-D -- the 12-step alcoholic rehab Holy Bush Spirit, LAWD, LAWD, LAWD… HEP’ US WID ‘R SINF’L WAYS HEER B’L’OUGH. … when their agenda ran up against some organizations that had “God” in their name or literature, which previous understanding of the separation of church and state prohibited from receiving federal dollars, what does Our Boy, the Chimp do? -- why, he declares that that showed how the damned liberals would stoop to using God to discriminate against the religious. Yep. Maybe not in these exact words but with this exact meaning: to reverse what “God” meant. Anyone who would do that is either overstuffed with chutzpa, or has something going for him on the side. No one challenged his bait-switch, nor his reversal – allowing the nation to slide directly toward into Abu Ghraib, flying torture chambers, and Alberto Gonzalez being rumored as Supreme Court stuff.

Now we see not just What is on his/their side – the driving psychological force behind a mentality that would attack a helpless, already broken country, known not to be a threat; maniacally escalating terror upon terror to frighten the public into supporting a massively cruel, irreversibly destructive, irreparable gash in international diplomatic efforts, with ultra hate-generating factors toward America built into the situation due to alignment with Israel. We also see Who – the personnel, in the forefront and behind the curtain as well.


CONCLUSION AND CONSEQUENCES

Until refuted (see below for something that doesn’t count – changes the subject to a diffrenent ‘reality’, naturally), the above establishes the right to predicate on these people who share this mentality as not having the right to exist. They have deliberately committed serial mass killing; now are deliberately lying about the past to cover it up.

Whoever does not oppose them is with them: Anti-American, Anti-Christian, Anti-human, claiming to be all those things in reversal of reality.

The reasons the death penalty must be demanded are: justice – blood for blood.
Ineducable twistedness; incapacity of self-criticism or self-restraint.
Reckoning for their reversal of the true meaning and value of God, Country and Christianity.