Sid Thomas S*-ing to Power

S*-ing to Power **** S is for Sign, * is for Use. S*, as in S*-ing, is for SLINGING THE SHLONG AGAINST PHILOSOPHICAL AND OTHER ABUSE (Let S* be verse, picture, symbology, rant, whatever talks eternal, American, now) The world is ready and waiting for what we can do here. As John Calvin put it, differently, "It's up to you."

My Photo
Name:
Location: Binghamton, New York, United States

This is an attempt to extend conversations begun over many years into the present, applying results of work in between to gain analytic method, continuity, scope, depth, vivacity and permanence

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

KAGANONOMICS

Kaganonomics: JA P (Jawbone Ass Power) – reaction-formation (hate regime) SCOTUS
(Killer Mommy Squared – Ontological skin crawl – you ain’t solid against this, you ain’t square with the world)


JEWISH <= criticism as such muted by charges of ‘anti-Semitism’ even though this ethnic minority is vastly over-represented on the national stage in proportion to its numbers, and Kagan could be presumed to favor legislative language ‘good for the Jews’ over any remotely accusatory, even if fairly argued. Since relations to Israel impact many substantive current issues, from separation of Church and State (they say “synagogue”), response to its insults, foreign policy, to prosecutions against Israel for spying and other illegal activities inside the U.S.. These cannot be overseen by the eye of a Jewess without assumption of gross prejudice. And, on such momentous upcoming decisions, no SCOUS justice has the right to recuse themselves. Therefore her nomination carries with it the tacit assumption of gross prejudice in favor of Israel in judicial perspective. It must be rejected on this ground. But not this alone.

PRINCESS (<=reversed: homosexual) She is also an outspoken defender of homosexual rights, widely rumored lesbian (strategic ambiguity, perhaps, like the nukes in Netanyahu’s pouch). The same objection raised against her Jewisness as disqualifying existential bias, applies here. There is no mystique, no secret Latina Woman wisdom, about what is at issue: the definition of the term “marriage”, and whether what the U.S. Constitution means by “equality” is illegitimately stretched to covert “same sex unions”. She ought to be able to give a simple “Yes” or “No” to that, if asked.

But neither of these critical desiderata will be brought up to challenge Kagan’s nomination. The first would be labeled anti-Semitic; the second, homophobic. Together, they represent “Gay Jewishness”, inverted from male to female; this pairing presented as a “compromise formation”, through her female identity. Coming on the heels of Mother’s Day, pun intended, this one is truly, truly one piece of work.

What was that NYC-obliterating bomb plot linked to “Al Queda Pakistan” in the news yesterday? Capping the old oil spew? well not yet. Stock market crash? What stock market crash. Wonder where all the pain went.

In addition to blocking collective short term memory, this lesbian Jewish non-mom becomes a revenge tool to reverse male oppression. Since the female form of Kagan’s body is the compromise formation combining the other two aggressive tokens, challenging her in person, as the Senate hearing will, places the ones doing it in the position of “oppressing women”. This completes the circle of reaction-formation brought over from the female (reversal of sex role) to male (reversal of male authority point of view). It’s white male women haters (the ‘Right’), vrs. Multicult Killer Mommy (the ‘Left’). In a nutshell. That is the confluence of opposites to which the political psychodynamics has led.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home