For fear of the Jews
http://www.sobran.com/fearofjews.shtml
On Judith Miller - Does the New York Times have a Conservative Bias? 2003-05-12 16:30:29
By Paul K. MacDonald (Casus Belli) May 4, 2003 A fascinating new article by Daniel Forbes highlights the links between Judith Miller, the New York Times reporter who received notoriety for her shocking scoop on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program entitled "Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, an Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert", and the Middle East Forum, a conservative think tank run by Daniel Pipes. Miller is listed as one of the Forum's "Experts on Islam, Islamism and the Middle East" and has spoken at events sponsored by the Forum. Pipes, of course, is a controversial Middle East commentator, who was recently nominated to the board of the United States Institute of Peace despite the objections of many Muslim American advocacy groups.
When it was originally published, Miller's article was criticized, notably by Jack Shafer of Slate, for not being forthcoming about the nature of her cooperation with military officials and the reliability of her sources.
Conspiracy theorists will see the obvious linkage -- Miller shares Pipes conservative opinions on the Middle East, and therefore she wrote a biased piece that claimed to have new a scoop about Iraqi WMD even though her information was incomplete and unsubstantiated. That would be a serious claim, one that would require more research both into Miller's reporting techniques and the nature of the connections between Miller and the Middle East Forum....
*****/
Answer to above question: yes. Except it isn't "conservative", its "neoconservative." They've hi-jacked the name along with everything else. See National Review editor Ramesh Pornuru's "Why Conservativers Are Divided" on Monday's Times Op-ed piece 10.17. ‘05. Neocon Zionist factions in editor's waterclosets across the nation.
The only force that doesn't seem to be afraid of the Jews is God. Here comes Wilma. Until the lying and denying what was behind the "get Joe Wilson" shtick ("not good for the Jews, what he's saying") stops the destruction of America will continue. Who got blacks to riot against neo-Nazis in Holy Toledo I wonder?
Libby's letter to jailed Judy was clear: "blame it on Rove, and you can come back into the neocon fold and get work. He's not one of us, and everybody hates him anyway." Well, she didn't. Now they're stuck.
On Judith Miller - Does the New York Times have a Conservative Bias? 2003-05-12 16:30:29
By Paul K. MacDonald (Casus Belli) May 4, 2003 A fascinating new article by Daniel Forbes highlights the links between Judith Miller, the New York Times reporter who received notoriety for her shocking scoop on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program entitled "Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, an Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert", and the Middle East Forum, a conservative think tank run by Daniel Pipes. Miller is listed as one of the Forum's "Experts on Islam, Islamism and the Middle East" and has spoken at events sponsored by the Forum. Pipes, of course, is a controversial Middle East commentator, who was recently nominated to the board of the United States Institute of Peace despite the objections of many Muslim American advocacy groups.
When it was originally published, Miller's article was criticized, notably by Jack Shafer of Slate, for not being forthcoming about the nature of her cooperation with military officials and the reliability of her sources.
Conspiracy theorists will see the obvious linkage -- Miller shares Pipes conservative opinions on the Middle East, and therefore she wrote a biased piece that claimed to have new a scoop about Iraqi WMD even though her information was incomplete and unsubstantiated. That would be a serious claim, one that would require more research both into Miller's reporting techniques and the nature of the connections between Miller and the Middle East Forum....
*****/
Answer to above question: yes. Except it isn't "conservative", its "neoconservative." They've hi-jacked the name along with everything else. See National Review editor Ramesh Pornuru's "Why Conservativers Are Divided" on Monday's Times Op-ed piece 10.17. ‘05. Neocon Zionist factions in editor's waterclosets across the nation.
The only force that doesn't seem to be afraid of the Jews is God. Here comes Wilma. Until the lying and denying what was behind the "get Joe Wilson" shtick ("not good for the Jews, what he's saying") stops the destruction of America will continue. Who got blacks to riot against neo-Nazis in Holy Toledo I wonder?
Libby's letter to jailed Judy was clear: "blame it on Rove, and you can come back into the neocon fold and get work. He's not one of us, and everybody hates him anyway." Well, she didn't. Now they're stuck.
posted by Sid Thomas | 6:27 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home