Don't Kill Babies and Jews
Don’t Kill Babies and Jews
Janet Napolitano’s warning of rising right wing ‘extremist’ violence in mid April '09, after the shooting of three Pittsburgh police officers by 22 yr old anti-government, pro-gun skinhead, was widely used by the MSM to link the shooting of abortion doctor Tiller in Wichita and holocaust museum guard Johns in Washington D.C.. (Ex. Herbert, NYTimes 6.20 “A Threat We Can’t Ignore” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/20/opinion/20herbert.html?_r=1 )
This is a discussion of that linkage.
The abortion Dr. and holocaust guard shootings took place at sacral shrines, amplifying symbolism and audience. Both victims were in the act of welcoming their killer; one as a church usher, the other as door opener. This theme of turning the gun on welcomers was also present in Binghamton’s American Civic Association shooting by Jiverly Wong.
The subtext is “let those engaged in doing good works beware of twisted, evil mentality prepared to kill them for it.” Thus, abortion providers, Jews, and local law enforcement, three very hi-profile subgroups of citizens, have had their daily on-going work situations radically altered since early April. Since the killings were for soul reasons (‘ideology’, ‘worldview’), and these widely shared by partisans, they link mentality (thought) with deed (violence) as if these were ‘extremists’, acting as martyrs for what everyone knows many view as justified, “Justified homicide” was known to be a topic discussed by anti-abortionists. The shooter, Roeder, was known to be an over-the-top
defender of the idea that abortionists were ‘murdering the unborn’. Polls indicated a public shift in this direction in May. Since his unrepentant attitude signals belief that he acted consistently and bravely, thus challenging like minded ones to follow suit, warning is rightly taken from this to crack down on all; on the mentality, itself. Certainly, it must be justified to eliminate ideological justification for murder as a standing group situation. As if the rest of us enjoyed life only by the grace of their forebearance, which higher duty to conscience might cause them to abrogate.
Which is, in fact, the deepest root of existential enantiodromia (reversal of opposites). Those living and enjoying life in America are only free do so with their permission; they will kill you to save abstract humanity. Indeed, you may one of those whom they have saved from death, if their Operation Rescue efforts helped prevent your mother killing you in her womb. This way of thinking must be reversed. No one has the right to live in America under this projective delusion foisted off under the name of state religion. This is the issue Judge Sonya Sotomayor must face. She must prevent Catholic and other anti-abortionists from attaching America’s God to justify psychokillers.
****
The Holocaust Museum shooting June 10: Sign Use Con/Disjunctions
Token numerology (number signs ‘gone viral’)
88 <= 1988, G.H.W. Bush elected/ / Harpur College, Binghamton fake hate crime
Swastikas spraypainted on the JSU wall. Outrage organized at Kristalnacht
Memorial service. JSU president arrested later, fingerprints on can.
Hitler; SS symbolism 1942 … 88 ivories on the piano keyboard
22 <=Pittsburgh shooter’s age; caliber of Von Brunn’s rifle.
many other double twos
44 <=th President – had just spoken of personal sense “evil” emanating from Buchanwald
Name tokens
Von Brunn < => “Bruno” (Nazi/gay conjunction)
Ann and Emmett- Title of play at holocaust museum written by Hispanic wife of
Wm. Cohen; interrupted by the shooting, repeatedly berated as “HATE! HATE! HATE!” to the point of evoking wonder whose hate was showing more. But one guarding them was, of course killed, so they would be most anxious.
Again, an over-the-top ‘extremist’ is represented as running amok, acting out what is consistent with, and secretly desired by, a large number of anti-semites. Von Brunn is Mr. NeoNazi, brought to the scene of the holocaust to attack the Neocons. Neocons NeoNazis. So they could Kill The Best Gentile.
Here is another today
PRESIDENT OBAMA IS TREATING OUR FRIEND LIKE A FIEND, AND TURNING PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST AN ALLY
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06212009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/israel_betrayed_175391.htm The article is a blast against Oboma for mentioning the West Bank Settlements in his Cairo Speech.
“This dramatic shift in American policy began several months ago when the administration signaled that it would make the cessation of Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank the centerpiece of its policy to revamp the region. And that approach, mostly hinted at through anonymous leaks, became as good as official when Obama delivered his vaunted address to the Muslim world in Cairo earlier this month. In that speech, Israel (and, specifically, its policy of settlement construction) was the only state to merit specific criticism from the president of the United States. Among all the degradations and injustices in the Middle East, from the abhorrent treatment of women in nations like Saudi Arabia, to Syrian-backed assassinations of pro-sovereignty politicians in Lebanon, to the arrest and imprisonment of gay men in Egypt, the leader of the free world singled out America's one, reliable democratic ally in the region for rebuke.”
But it wasn’t a matter of “rebuke”, it was a matter of being honest. James Kirchick’s article is obviously more than hysterical over-reaction to this one point. It, of course, as a sticking point long announced, had no parity to Saudi Arabia’s treatment of women or homosexuality in Egypt. These are wedge issues urged on Obama to intervene in their culture. It was announced that West Bank settlement expansion would be halted or negotiated; then Israel pre-emptively resumed, treating him as they had Colin Powel (crushing Jenin and Arafat while he stood by; ‘improving their position’ before entering into bargaining).
Then – now – the crowning Double Reversal. It’s NOT THEM stabbing him in the back; IT’s HIM! --treating a “friend like a fiend”
“The Jews rewarded Obama with nearly 80% of their votes, more than they gave John Kerry”, and look at the thanks they get. “ISRAEL BETRAYED”. He is “turning America against Israel”.
Data: “The percentage of American voters who call themselves supporters of Israel has plummeted from 69% last September to 49% this month, according to the Israel Project. Meanwhile, only 6% of Jewish Israelis consider Obama to be "pro-Israel," a Jerusalem Post poll found, pointing to a disturbing gulf between the two nations. There are even signs of rising anti-Semitism, as a survey by Columbia and Stanford professors found that 32% of Democrats blamed Jews for the financial crisis.” (This last point was covered in PostOpinon by Wm. Kristol “Look Who Blames The Jews”, 6.16)
They take themselves to be unrivalled readers of the group mind, pre-emptively texting what everybody is experiencing deep down in their (sexual) soul (a touch ‘o titillation is required of every communication – its their bag, ‘ya know.) Whenever a big symbolic item pops up that affects them, therefore, it is always immediately to be suspected that they have arranged it for the effect. Just as the spouse is always the first suspect in a domestic killing blamed on a mysterious intruder.
A week after Obama returns from his Mid East trip in early June, the holocaust memorial guard shooting occurs. That probably pushed the polls up for them up a bit.
The question of whether Von Brunn wasn’t used as a patsy to whip up hatred of Jews, to the point of actually killing the guard, then him, could be settled by simple forensics. Match the bullet the coroner took out of Johns with the rifle Von Brunn is proven to have fired. Since this could be done (with independent oversight at every point, to avoid non-tampering with evidence, and death penalty for any who does it), and that would settle this point, at least; if it isn’t done, then either there was a false flag, fake hate murder or the authorities deliberately want the question left open for some reason, perhaps to entrap and kill whoever calls attention to the obscene abomination of their twisted perversity.
****
Don’t kill babies -- used to justify killing Dr. Tiller. Gives Catholic morality a blood-token, and a boost in the polls. May 31, after Obama had just talked of finding ‘common ground’ at Notre Dame graduation speaker.
Don’t kill Jews – used to justify killing Von Brunn (on the ‘patsy’ hypothesis). Gives Jewish holocaust morality a new blood token, and a boost in the polls. June 10, after Obama had just returned from the Middle East.
Is there a deeper connection between these, other than through blood sacrifice sacrament response to the 44th president’s gesture?
Yes, through a particular statement made by John Cardinal O’Connor in the 70’s, as the abortion debate was gaining steam: Liberals killing ‘bables’ in abortion clinics is morally analogous to Nazi’s killing Jews in gas chambers. In psychohistorical terms, this was “group psychotic insight’ . It connects, through unconscious group-fantasy, fetus as ‘babies’ in the womb, with Jews in gas chambers. “Jews” The Unborn. You kill one, you kill the other. BOTH MUST BE SAVED UNDER IMPERATIVE of morality! This is group psychotic insight. His equivalence was so well received he was promoted to chief prelate of New York, then Cardinal, living at the Vatican.
This further connection is brought to the surface, without being said, by the mass media’s linkage of the two killings. It was all over cable TV news as well as print.
Inclusion of the Pittsburgh shootings, but not Binghamton’s, as by Bob Herbert, bring in the police, as well as babies and Jews, for right wing extremists not to kill.
Note: The game of the FBI is to divide Americans by heightening suspicion of each other’s link with criminals. Suspicion pushes people to align with approved, ‘not one of them’ factions, which potentiates ‘extremists’ fake hate incidents to ‘prove’ one side or the other are the ‘good guys’. That is what they did in the false flag anthrax terrorism. Dr. Bruce Ivins was accused, surveilled, driven to kill himself, while all who knew and worked with him watched him take the fall, wondering who among them spread what lies.
Janet Napolitano’s warning of rising right wing ‘extremist’ violence in mid April '09, after the shooting of three Pittsburgh police officers by 22 yr old anti-government, pro-gun skinhead, was widely used by the MSM to link the shooting of abortion doctor Tiller in Wichita and holocaust museum guard Johns in Washington D.C.. (Ex. Herbert, NYTimes 6.20 “A Threat We Can’t Ignore” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/20/opinion/20herbert.html?_r=1 )
This is a discussion of that linkage.
The abortion Dr. and holocaust guard shootings took place at sacral shrines, amplifying symbolism and audience. Both victims were in the act of welcoming their killer; one as a church usher, the other as door opener. This theme of turning the gun on welcomers was also present in Binghamton’s American Civic Association shooting by Jiverly Wong.
The subtext is “let those engaged in doing good works beware of twisted, evil mentality prepared to kill them for it.” Thus, abortion providers, Jews, and local law enforcement, three very hi-profile subgroups of citizens, have had their daily on-going work situations radically altered since early April. Since the killings were for soul reasons (‘ideology’, ‘worldview’), and these widely shared by partisans, they link mentality (thought) with deed (violence) as if these were ‘extremists’, acting as martyrs for what everyone knows many view as justified, “Justified homicide” was known to be a topic discussed by anti-abortionists. The shooter, Roeder, was known to be an over-the-top
defender of the idea that abortionists were ‘murdering the unborn’. Polls indicated a public shift in this direction in May. Since his unrepentant attitude signals belief that he acted consistently and bravely, thus challenging like minded ones to follow suit, warning is rightly taken from this to crack down on all; on the mentality, itself. Certainly, it must be justified to eliminate ideological justification for murder as a standing group situation. As if the rest of us enjoyed life only by the grace of their forebearance, which higher duty to conscience might cause them to abrogate.
Which is, in fact, the deepest root of existential enantiodromia (reversal of opposites). Those living and enjoying life in America are only free do so with their permission; they will kill you to save abstract humanity. Indeed, you may one of those whom they have saved from death, if their Operation Rescue efforts helped prevent your mother killing you in her womb. This way of thinking must be reversed. No one has the right to live in America under this projective delusion foisted off under the name of state religion. This is the issue Judge Sonya Sotomayor must face. She must prevent Catholic and other anti-abortionists from attaching America’s God to justify psychokillers.
****
The Holocaust Museum shooting June 10: Sign Use Con/Disjunctions
Token numerology (number signs ‘gone viral’)
88 <= 1988, G.H.W. Bush elected/ / Harpur College, Binghamton fake hate crime
Swastikas spraypainted on the JSU wall. Outrage organized at Kristalnacht
Memorial service. JSU president arrested later, fingerprints on can.
Hitler; SS symbolism 1942 … 88 ivories on the piano keyboard
22 <=Pittsburgh shooter’s age; caliber of Von Brunn’s rifle.
many other double twos
44 <=th President – had just spoken of personal sense “evil” emanating from Buchanwald
Name tokens
Von Brunn < => “Bruno” (Nazi/gay conjunction)
Ann and Emmett- Title of play at holocaust museum written by Hispanic wife of
Wm. Cohen; interrupted by the shooting, repeatedly berated as “HATE! HATE! HATE!” to the point of evoking wonder whose hate was showing more. But one guarding them was, of course killed, so they would be most anxious.
Again, an over-the-top ‘extremist’ is represented as running amok, acting out what is consistent with, and secretly desired by, a large number of anti-semites. Von Brunn is Mr. NeoNazi, brought to the scene of the holocaust to attack the Neocons. Neocons NeoNazis. So they could Kill The Best Gentile.
Here is another today
PRESIDENT OBAMA IS TREATING OUR FRIEND LIKE A FIEND, AND TURNING PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST AN ALLY
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06212009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/israel_betrayed_175391.htm The article is a blast against Oboma for mentioning the West Bank Settlements in his Cairo Speech.
“This dramatic shift in American policy began several months ago when the administration signaled that it would make the cessation of Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank the centerpiece of its policy to revamp the region. And that approach, mostly hinted at through anonymous leaks, became as good as official when Obama delivered his vaunted address to the Muslim world in Cairo earlier this month. In that speech, Israel (and, specifically, its policy of settlement construction) was the only state to merit specific criticism from the president of the United States. Among all the degradations and injustices in the Middle East, from the abhorrent treatment of women in nations like Saudi Arabia, to Syrian-backed assassinations of pro-sovereignty politicians in Lebanon, to the arrest and imprisonment of gay men in Egypt, the leader of the free world singled out America's one, reliable democratic ally in the region for rebuke.”
But it wasn’t a matter of “rebuke”, it was a matter of being honest. James Kirchick’s article is obviously more than hysterical over-reaction to this one point. It, of course, as a sticking point long announced, had no parity to Saudi Arabia’s treatment of women or homosexuality in Egypt. These are wedge issues urged on Obama to intervene in their culture. It was announced that West Bank settlement expansion would be halted or negotiated; then Israel pre-emptively resumed, treating him as they had Colin Powel (crushing Jenin and Arafat while he stood by; ‘improving their position’ before entering into bargaining).
Then – now – the crowning Double Reversal. It’s NOT THEM stabbing him in the back; IT’s HIM! --treating a “friend like a fiend”
“The Jews rewarded Obama with nearly 80% of their votes, more than they gave John Kerry”, and look at the thanks they get. “ISRAEL BETRAYED”. He is “turning America against Israel”.
Data: “The percentage of American voters who call themselves supporters of Israel has plummeted from 69% last September to 49% this month, according to the Israel Project. Meanwhile, only 6% of Jewish Israelis consider Obama to be "pro-Israel," a Jerusalem Post poll found, pointing to a disturbing gulf between the two nations. There are even signs of rising anti-Semitism, as a survey by Columbia and Stanford professors found that 32% of Democrats blamed Jews for the financial crisis.” (This last point was covered in PostOpinon by Wm. Kristol “Look Who Blames The Jews”, 6.16)
They take themselves to be unrivalled readers of the group mind, pre-emptively texting what everybody is experiencing deep down in their (sexual) soul (a touch ‘o titillation is required of every communication – its their bag, ‘ya know.) Whenever a big symbolic item pops up that affects them, therefore, it is always immediately to be suspected that they have arranged it for the effect. Just as the spouse is always the first suspect in a domestic killing blamed on a mysterious intruder.
A week after Obama returns from his Mid East trip in early June, the holocaust memorial guard shooting occurs. That probably pushed the polls up for them up a bit.
The question of whether Von Brunn wasn’t used as a patsy to whip up hatred of Jews, to the point of actually killing the guard, then him, could be settled by simple forensics. Match the bullet the coroner took out of Johns with the rifle Von Brunn is proven to have fired. Since this could be done (with independent oversight at every point, to avoid non-tampering with evidence, and death penalty for any who does it), and that would settle this point, at least; if it isn’t done, then either there was a false flag, fake hate murder or the authorities deliberately want the question left open for some reason, perhaps to entrap and kill whoever calls attention to the obscene abomination of their twisted perversity.
****
Don’t kill babies -- used to justify killing Dr. Tiller. Gives Catholic morality a blood-token, and a boost in the polls. May 31, after Obama had just talked of finding ‘common ground’ at Notre Dame graduation speaker.
Don’t kill Jews – used to justify killing Von Brunn (on the ‘patsy’ hypothesis). Gives Jewish holocaust morality a new blood token, and a boost in the polls. June 10, after Obama had just returned from the Middle East.
Is there a deeper connection between these, other than through blood sacrifice sacrament response to the 44th president’s gesture?
Yes, through a particular statement made by John Cardinal O’Connor in the 70’s, as the abortion debate was gaining steam: Liberals killing ‘bables’ in abortion clinics is morally analogous to Nazi’s killing Jews in gas chambers. In psychohistorical terms, this was “group psychotic insight’ . It connects, through unconscious group-fantasy, fetus as ‘babies’ in the womb, with Jews in gas chambers. “Jews” The Unborn. You kill one, you kill the other. BOTH MUST BE SAVED UNDER IMPERATIVE of morality! This is group psychotic insight. His equivalence was so well received he was promoted to chief prelate of New York, then Cardinal, living at the Vatican.
This further connection is brought to the surface, without being said, by the mass media’s linkage of the two killings. It was all over cable TV news as well as print.
Inclusion of the Pittsburgh shootings, but not Binghamton’s, as by Bob Herbert, bring in the police, as well as babies and Jews, for right wing extremists not to kill.
Note: The game of the FBI is to divide Americans by heightening suspicion of each other’s link with criminals. Suspicion pushes people to align with approved, ‘not one of them’ factions, which potentiates ‘extremists’ fake hate incidents to ‘prove’ one side or the other are the ‘good guys’. That is what they did in the false flag anthrax terrorism. Dr. Bruce Ivins was accused, surveilled, driven to kill himself, while all who knew and worked with him watched him take the fall, wondering who among them spread what lies.
posted by Sid Thomas | 10:17 PM
1 Comments:
Ann and Emmett.
Emmett is an old word meaning 'uncle'. Aunt and uncle.
Post a Comment
<< Home