AVATAR WAR, NOW!
AVATAR WAR
RAND PAUL -- Son of Ron <= on the Right
…Madcow Maddow => on the Left
Birth of Tea Party Avatar Rand Paul
(and me, Sid Thomas, Avatar cruncher)
WHITE BOYS HOPE – <= what we got this time
Across the way, his Counterpart
Rachel (“Are you my Mother?) Kagan
for SCOTUS
(The One with She-Lawyers Legs out -> over there)
NEOCON APOTHEOSIS
*****
White Hero Black Avatar
“Paul is one of the movement’s card-carrying founding fathers. From the start, he openly defined himself as a Tea Party tribune, and its followers embraced him (and contributed too him) as their uncompromising avatar. Now, after months of debate about what this movement is and isn’t, Paul’s victory provides clear-cut answers.” (F. Rich, NYT 5.23)
Thus according to the popular movie script, to ever achieve redemption from guilt, he would have to give up being a White, Southern, Male (subtext => racist, misogynous, homophobic, anti-Semitic, Indian killing) man on earth; condense his suppressed good essence into a stream of mystic energy sent out to help those his kind have wronged; have sex with, and assimilate his purified spirit with lovely aliens. That’s what Rand Paul’s Avatar-inside-the-man must do, and must be seen trying to do – or he’s just plain evil; and everything he says and does proceeds from regressive chauvinist male pig mentality. The Nav’i were blue, not red; as in liberal (mostly North East) States. He must be sacrificed to them. Forget any beauty you might see in him on TV. That will be the dark side of the moon.
As Avatar, his is the power of paleoconservatism, as on the Original Dissent Forum board, run by Texas Dissident, TD. Slogan: NO WAR FOR ISRAEL. That’s what kept me posting there several years until ’04, when they waffled on G.W. Bush (who could stomach Kerry?), as did several of those behind Paul, I suspect. They’re good Americans. Handled Rand Paul well. Keep him beautiful, guys. He’ll toughen up the rest. Rachel says so (cf. her tuning fork vibration metaphor).
Paleoconservatives are natural enemies in the wild of both the Republican Party and neoconservatism. Thus NYTimes conservative columnist Ross Douthart, commenting on Paul, is obliged to recognize the paleoconservative ideology, eschewing “Tea Party” amorphousness, even while ignoring its anti-Israeli (anti-‘conspiracy theory’ talkers would call it "anti-semitic")
Hysterical Reversal by The Left (attacking him).
He dares question federal jurisdiction over the states in regard to privately owned businesses guaranteeing public access. This
It is the dialectic of Civil Rights vs. States Rights, residue of America’s slavery issue that led to the war between the states.
. This is enough to get Rich to pitch the race card.
“With Rand Paul, we get further evidence of race’s role in a movement whose growth precisely parallels the ascent of America’s first African-American president.” This is chart-thinking. One goes with the other, you see: rise of Tea Party, rise of Obama. The bad guys, the good guys. Expected, it was. (Maybe planned for, as by planting Town Hall disrupters, quasi ‘home grown terrorists’ like the Newberg 4.) Even questioning LBJ’s Civil Rights ’64 legislation, as Goldwater did (did Hillary Clinton?), undermines the basis of the new society launched then, as the Vietnam war was just entering consciousness along with Bob Dylan, The Beatles, psychedelics and Leary.
“He takes America back to Jim Crow days,” Rich cries for the baby boomer enlightened. The always-moral mass media rises up in Righteous Indignation Galore to round on the bad guys! and praise the good! This constraint inexorably exacerbates White/Black race tensions with reverse moral values. Blacks get to be the good guys this time around. Whites… b-a-a-d .
“The Tea Party is a right-wing populist movement with a specific ideology. It resides in the aging white base of the Republican Party and wants to purge that party of leaders who veer from its dogma.” But this intolerance is most obviously manifest right here, in the ‘leftist’ black/women/homosexual populist front, for whom Rand Paul’s stand hysterically generalizes to an attack on civilization’s progress.
*****
The bottom line is an antinomy of consciousness: neither side can be denied w/o self-contradiction; but
one of the two will win, unless a wild card is played. designation of split conservative Tea Party”. The situation therefore illustrates a union of polar opposites, both of which are self-contradictory.
PSYCHOSEMIOTICS MID-TERM ELECTION EXAM
Lecture title: All out Token War in the Mosh Pit
Little Class! Little Class! What links these? Rand Paul’s Victory in Kentucky… and …Kagan’s legs (note: WaPo: “(she) sits with her legs ajar” “why doesn’t she cross her legs like a lady?” – responded to by NYTimes picture of them undeniably crossed and sticking out at you).
(=>in the Group-Cs. totality, this is a token of mother hatred. Cf. Scott Roeder’s creedt: “they’re murders; act like it”. Anti-abortionist psychosis is ultimate mother hatred: “kill the killer Mommy before she kills you” – this generalizes over to the Nanny State as
Kagan’s installment will stack the SCOTUS with 6 Catholics and 3 Jews. That is the first reason sufficient to block it.
Her Jewishness
The fact that she is Jewish, resumed “Dean of Harvard Law School,” where Professor Alan Dershowitz has defended the legality of torture, state assassination; and outside strict international law, “Israel’s right to exist,” protégé of L. Summers, who brought her from the U. of Chicago,…is never mentioned.
(cut to…Kagan’s legs. These have become an issue. WaPo, commenting on pictures of her, interviewed by lovely Mid-Eastern woman, “(she) sits with her legs ajar” “why doesn’t she cross her legs like a lady?” NYTimes respons with picture of Kagans gams undeniably crossed and sticking out at you. Take that, Rand Paul.)
Her sexuality -- widely rumored homosexual; neither affirmed or denied by her, avoided in all interviews -- as if introduced in order to be ‘strategically denied’)
This injection of Kagan’s legs, ajar or crossed, into mainstream content through these two major group-fantasy sources should not go unnoticed. It is, I humbly submit, remarkable, for several reasons. But will only seem so if one stops and thinks about it. (The more one does, the odder it gets.)
-to wit: look at the position it puts Rand Paul in. Here is a pretty transparent, honest man opening a new page. Son of Ron Paul, King of (some) Paleoconservatives, claimed by Ayn Rand libertarians, tagged as “Tea Party” candidate despite having recently won against other Republican presidential aspirants; but nobody knows what the “Tea Party“ is, exactly, except that “it” a. has ‘leaders’, b. activists (reviling NYC Mosque near ground zero), and c. now, according to Frank Rich, an Avatar. Rachel Maddow used a tuning fork to illustrate how this twin-arm vibrating instrument (she had referred to something making her vibrate last Wednesday, yoking it up w/ Keith). When touched to the ground (brilliant action-metaphor!) it produces a sound; wave lengths audible to the human ear. This is how she sees Rand Paul: a spreadable (cf contagion, ‘radio-active’ <=state of mental excitement by suggestibility) energy-force, picking up consonant vibrations (like a ‘contagion’, ‘dangerous’, ‘radioactive’ <= tokening a state of mental excitement, susceptibility to seduction if you listen), pretty soon becoming a song everyone starts humming, in their own way, of course. Such is the constellating power of the Archetype. The Archetype/avatar of conservatism constellated outside the political system is tokened “Rand Paul”. On split screen Left, (facing right) is Kagan’s legs.
This is mid-term ’08 -/’10/ - ’12 psychohistorical vortex point. (A new way of relating to history, and the present, using unconscious fantasy token mashups).
VIBRATE WITH RACHEL, INSTEAD!
The New Pitch: RP and EK are the two arms of the tuning fork, grounded in the American political psyche
THE ANTINOMY: TO AFFIRM OR DENY IS EQUALLY SELF-CONTRADICTORY; NO THIRD ALTERNATIVE.
-Only the self-hating (or mother hating) can participate. This rules out good Father’s sons of old White America. These beautiful, bashful, blushing blond/blue-eyed boys and girls of Dixie – whew!.. “marching as to war…”
http://www.thenation.com/article/she-lawyers-and-other-improbable-creatures
RAND PAUL -- Son of Ron <= on the Right
…Madcow Maddow => on the Left
Birth of Tea Party Avatar Rand Paul
(and me, Sid Thomas, Avatar cruncher)
WHITE BOYS HOPE – <= what we got this time
Across the way, his Counterpart
Rachel (“Are you my Mother?) Kagan
for SCOTUS
(The One with She-Lawyers Legs out -> over there)
NEOCON APOTHEOSIS
*****
White Hero Black Avatar
“Paul is one of the movement’s card-carrying founding fathers. From the start, he openly defined himself as a Tea Party tribune, and its followers embraced him (and contributed too him) as their uncompromising avatar. Now, after months of debate about what this movement is and isn’t, Paul’s victory provides clear-cut answers.” (F. Rich, NYT 5.23)
Thus according to the popular movie script, to ever achieve redemption from guilt, he would have to give up being a White, Southern, Male (subtext => racist, misogynous, homophobic, anti-Semitic, Indian killing) man on earth; condense his suppressed good essence into a stream of mystic energy sent out to help those his kind have wronged; have sex with, and assimilate his purified spirit with lovely aliens. That’s what Rand Paul’s Avatar-inside-the-man must do, and must be seen trying to do – or he’s just plain evil; and everything he says and does proceeds from regressive chauvinist male pig mentality. The Nav’i were blue, not red; as in liberal (mostly North East) States. He must be sacrificed to them. Forget any beauty you might see in him on TV. That will be the dark side of the moon.
As Avatar, his is the power of paleoconservatism, as on the Original Dissent Forum board, run by Texas Dissident, TD. Slogan: NO WAR FOR ISRAEL. That’s what kept me posting there several years until ’04, when they waffled on G.W. Bush (who could stomach Kerry?), as did several of those behind Paul, I suspect. They’re good Americans. Handled Rand Paul well. Keep him beautiful, guys. He’ll toughen up the rest. Rachel says so (cf. her tuning fork vibration metaphor).
Paleoconservatives are natural enemies in the wild of both the Republican Party and neoconservatism. Thus NYTimes conservative columnist Ross Douthart, commenting on Paul, is obliged to recognize the paleoconservative ideology, eschewing “Tea Party” amorphousness, even while ignoring its anti-Israeli (anti-‘conspiracy theory’ talkers would call it "anti-semitic")
Hysterical Reversal by The Left (attacking him).
He dares question federal jurisdiction over the states in regard to privately owned businesses guaranteeing public access. This
It is the dialectic of Civil Rights vs. States Rights, residue of America’s slavery issue that led to the war between the states.
. This is enough to get Rich to pitch the race card.
“With Rand Paul, we get further evidence of race’s role in a movement whose growth precisely parallels the ascent of America’s first African-American president.” This is chart-thinking. One goes with the other, you see: rise of Tea Party, rise of Obama. The bad guys, the good guys. Expected, it was. (Maybe planned for, as by planting Town Hall disrupters, quasi ‘home grown terrorists’ like the Newberg 4.) Even questioning LBJ’s Civil Rights ’64 legislation, as Goldwater did (did Hillary Clinton?), undermines the basis of the new society launched then, as the Vietnam war was just entering consciousness along with Bob Dylan, The Beatles, psychedelics and Leary.
“He takes America back to Jim Crow days,” Rich cries for the baby boomer enlightened. The always-moral mass media rises up in Righteous Indignation Galore to round on the bad guys! and praise the good! This constraint inexorably exacerbates White/Black race tensions with reverse moral values. Blacks get to be the good guys this time around. Whites… b-a-a-d .
“The Tea Party is a right-wing populist movement with a specific ideology. It resides in the aging white base of the Republican Party and wants to purge that party of leaders who veer from its dogma.” But this intolerance is most obviously manifest right here, in the ‘leftist’ black/women/homosexual populist front, for whom Rand Paul’s stand hysterically generalizes to an attack on civilization’s progress.
*****
The bottom line is an antinomy of consciousness: neither side can be denied w/o self-contradiction; but
one of the two will win, unless a wild card is played. designation of split conservative Tea Party”. The situation therefore illustrates a union of polar opposites, both of which are self-contradictory.
PSYCHOSEMIOTICS MID-TERM ELECTION EXAM
Lecture title: All out Token War in the Mosh Pit
Little Class! Little Class! What links these? Rand Paul’s Victory in Kentucky… and …Kagan’s legs (note: WaPo: “(she) sits with her legs ajar” “why doesn’t she cross her legs like a lady?” – responded to by NYTimes picture of them undeniably crossed and sticking out at you).
(=>in the Group-Cs. totality, this is a token of mother hatred. Cf. Scott Roeder’s creedt: “they’re murders; act like it”. Anti-abortionist psychosis is ultimate mother hatred: “kill the killer Mommy before she kills you” – this generalizes over to the Nanny State as
Kagan’s installment will stack the SCOTUS with 6 Catholics and 3 Jews. That is the first reason sufficient to block it.
Her Jewishness
The fact that she is Jewish, resumed “Dean of Harvard Law School,” where Professor Alan Dershowitz has defended the legality of torture, state assassination; and outside strict international law, “Israel’s right to exist,” protégé of L. Summers, who brought her from the U. of Chicago,…is never mentioned.
(cut to…Kagan’s legs. These have become an issue. WaPo, commenting on pictures of her, interviewed by lovely Mid-Eastern woman, “(she) sits with her legs ajar” “why doesn’t she cross her legs like a lady?” NYTimes respons with picture of Kagans gams undeniably crossed and sticking out at you. Take that, Rand Paul.)
Her sexuality -- widely rumored homosexual; neither affirmed or denied by her, avoided in all interviews -- as if introduced in order to be ‘strategically denied’)
This injection of Kagan’s legs, ajar or crossed, into mainstream content through these two major group-fantasy sources should not go unnoticed. It is, I humbly submit, remarkable, for several reasons. But will only seem so if one stops and thinks about it. (The more one does, the odder it gets.)
-to wit: look at the position it puts Rand Paul in. Here is a pretty transparent, honest man opening a new page. Son of Ron Paul, King of (some) Paleoconservatives, claimed by Ayn Rand libertarians, tagged as “Tea Party” candidate despite having recently won against other Republican presidential aspirants; but nobody knows what the “Tea Party“ is, exactly, except that “it” a. has ‘leaders’, b. activists (reviling NYC Mosque near ground zero), and c. now, according to Frank Rich, an Avatar. Rachel Maddow used a tuning fork to illustrate how this twin-arm vibrating instrument (she had referred to something making her vibrate last Wednesday, yoking it up w/ Keith). When touched to the ground (brilliant action-metaphor!) it produces a sound; wave lengths audible to the human ear. This is how she sees Rand Paul: a spreadable (cf contagion, ‘radio-active’ <=state of mental excitement by suggestibility) energy-force, picking up consonant vibrations (like a ‘contagion’, ‘dangerous’, ‘radioactive’ <= tokening a state of mental excitement, susceptibility to seduction if you listen), pretty soon becoming a song everyone starts humming, in their own way, of course. Such is the constellating power of the Archetype. The Archetype/avatar of conservatism constellated outside the political system is tokened “Rand Paul”. On split screen Left, (facing right) is Kagan’s legs.
This is mid-term ’08 -/’10/ - ’12 psychohistorical vortex point. (A new way of relating to history, and the present, using unconscious fantasy token mashups).
VIBRATE WITH RACHEL, INSTEAD!
The New Pitch: RP and EK are the two arms of the tuning fork, grounded in the American political psyche
THE ANTINOMY: TO AFFIRM OR DENY IS EQUALLY SELF-CONTRADICTORY; NO THIRD ALTERNATIVE.
-Only the self-hating (or mother hating) can participate. This rules out good Father’s sons of old White America. These beautiful, bashful, blushing blond/blue-eyed boys and girls of Dixie – whew!.. “marching as to war…”
http://www.thenation.com/article/she-lawyers-and-other-improbable-creatures
posted by Sid Thomas | 6:00 AM
1 Comments:
The New Pitch: RP and EK are the two arms of the tuning fork, grounded in the American political psyche
GREAT LINE !!!!!!!!!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home