How use of "anti-Semitism" creates anti-Semitism
How use of (the term) “anti-Semitism” breeds anti-Semitism
The way Jews use “anti-Semitism” (see ADL’s Abe Foxman – “Never Again: The Threat of the New Ant-Semitism”; Phyllic Chessler --“The New Anti-Semitism”) is a token of, and provokes, what it rants against -- hatred of Jews.
This can be seen by, FIRST, realizing that: those identified with the Tribe's Zionist pretensions HAVE TO preemptively define the feeling and attitude of disapprobation evoked in reaction to the way they are, as a people. Otherwise, they would have to deal with spontaneous expressions of negativity ethnic minorities in general arouse and live down (Irish, Italians, blacks, Puerto Ricans, etc.). It is a measure of psychosemitoic control in the interest of group-ego: “HERE is what you are experiencing toward us – goes all the way back to Haman.” The idea that it could be a common sort of reaction to ‘differentness’, for which they are partly responsible by this preemptive labeling. is thus both tacitly admitted and denied. It’s like: you keep telling them (about Israel’s behavior, for instance) “Look, you can’t do that…” on the basis of good reasons; until, finally, they say “you’re just anti-Semitic.”
… and SECOND, by realizing that the HAVE TO define the disapprobative attitude UNDER THE COMMON GENERIC IDENTITY, WHICH ‘LOOPS’ THE SIGN-USE PROCESS THROUGH THE NON-INCLUDED OPPOSITE (Palestinians; Abraham’s concubine lineage). The generic racial term “semitic” again serves a dual purpose: to evoke, then split off from, identification with the (to them) abhorrent. This transposes negativity toward them ‘up’, to the level of the common predicate, then ‘back down’ to the infima species . Meanwhile, showing pictures of Arafat schmoozing (“Could you kiss this man?”)
Until it both these things are realized – 1. definition of other’s attitudes toward themselves for others; 2. by way invoking love-of-the-repulsive to avoid “anti-Semitism” getting applied as “hatred of Palestinians” (which no one thinks of doing, the Jews are so beautiful (show pics of Liz Taylor) and persecuted (show lines at the holocaust museums)) -- the cunning manipulation built into use of “anti-Semitic” won’t be seen.
It communicates as it does through a Sign-use pattern of double-double reverse negative (explained elsewhere; see http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=13900240 )
The way Jews use “anti-Semitism” (see ADL’s Abe Foxman – “Never Again: The Threat of the New Ant-Semitism”; Phyllic Chessler --“The New Anti-Semitism”) is a token of, and provokes, what it rants against -- hatred of Jews.
This can be seen by, FIRST, realizing that: those identified with the Tribe's Zionist pretensions HAVE TO preemptively define the feeling and attitude of disapprobation evoked in reaction to the way they are, as a people. Otherwise, they would have to deal with spontaneous expressions of negativity ethnic minorities in general arouse and live down (Irish, Italians, blacks, Puerto Ricans, etc.). It is a measure of psychosemitoic control in the interest of group-ego: “HERE is what you are experiencing toward us – goes all the way back to Haman.” The idea that it could be a common sort of reaction to ‘differentness’, for which they are partly responsible by this preemptive labeling. is thus both tacitly admitted and denied. It’s like: you keep telling them (about Israel’s behavior, for instance) “Look, you can’t do that…” on the basis of good reasons; until, finally, they say “you’re just anti-Semitic.”
… and SECOND, by realizing that the HAVE TO define the disapprobative attitude UNDER THE COMMON GENERIC IDENTITY, WHICH ‘LOOPS’ THE SIGN-USE PROCESS THROUGH THE NON-INCLUDED OPPOSITE (Palestinians; Abraham’s concubine lineage). The generic racial term “semitic” again serves a dual purpose: to evoke, then split off from, identification with the (to them) abhorrent. This transposes negativity toward them ‘up’, to the level of the common predicate, then ‘back down’ to the infima species . Meanwhile, showing pictures of Arafat schmoozing (“Could you kiss this man?”)
Until it both these things are realized – 1. definition of other’s attitudes toward themselves for others; 2. by way invoking love-of-the-repulsive to avoid “anti-Semitism” getting applied as “hatred of Palestinians” (which no one thinks of doing, the Jews are so beautiful (show pics of Liz Taylor) and persecuted (show lines at the holocaust museums)) -- the cunning manipulation built into use of “anti-Semitic” won’t be seen.
It communicates as it does through a Sign-use pattern of double-double reverse negative (explained elsewhere; see http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=13900240 )
posted by Sid Thomas | 10:20 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home