deception, manipulation, NYTimes
HOW THE NEW YORK TIMES
CONSPIRES TO DECEIVE AND MANIPULATE PUBLIC OPINION
…Subvert U.S. democracy to kill for Israel.
Evidence: Connect these dots 1.13.06
Item - President Bush for the first time Wednesday recognizes, without deigning to answer, charges that it was oil and Israel, not beneficence and democracy, that motivated his Iraq war. (NYTimes, A12 1.11.06)
Item -The Alito confirmations hearings studiously avoided any reference to religion, even though his confirmation amounts to stacking the bench with Roman Catholics. Given deceitful penetration of the FBI by twenty-five year veteran R.P. Hanssen, either using his open identification with the Opus Dei sect to cover double, perhaps triple spying operations inside the top-most agencies of the U.S. Government, how can the public be assured the Supreme Court is not infiltrated by this as a fifth column?
This is one-half the conspiracy. If this matter is not vetted, the U.S. Senate is subject to charges of malfeasance and dereliction of duty. The editors know this. It is their job to see it gets pointed out.
Item - For the New York Times to cite “extremism” to discredit Alito (1.12.05 Editorial on-line), echoing the chant of others, based on the “evidence” of his extended membership in Concerned Alumni of Princeton and without going into the case they were trying to make, is a detestable smear. Is it assumed to have been wrong to favor ROTC, oppose co-education and affirmative action at Princeton in that context? Both Alito and the Times’ editors seem to agree. But unless and until someone takes the opportunity to educate and enlighten us, the public, on what the official morality is supposed to be around here, judging judges and elsewhere, what we could be witnessing is this system blowing itself up before our eyes.
The same factor Bush mentioned in the first item shows up as studiously neglected in the second. It is the religious factor, specifically, Judaism and Catholicism. The “extremism” charge against Alito is the rhetorical substitute for refusing to confront this powerful religious complex. But it must be done. It is as if a pact had been forged: “We will keep anti-Catholicism at bay if you will keep anti-Semitism away” or vice versa. Who is going to intervene in that lover’s quarrel? Not Gibson or Speilberg, I’ll bet.
Sid Thomas, Ph.D
2327 Seneca St., Binghamton, New York 1390
607 773 0071
CONSPIRES TO DECEIVE AND MANIPULATE PUBLIC OPINION
…Subvert U.S. democracy to kill for Israel.
Evidence: Connect these dots 1.13.06
Item - President Bush for the first time Wednesday recognizes, without deigning to answer, charges that it was oil and Israel, not beneficence and democracy, that motivated his Iraq war. (NYTimes, A12 1.11.06)
Item -The Alito confirmations hearings studiously avoided any reference to religion, even though his confirmation amounts to stacking the bench with Roman Catholics. Given deceitful penetration of the FBI by twenty-five year veteran R.P. Hanssen, either using his open identification with the Opus Dei sect to cover double, perhaps triple spying operations inside the top-most agencies of the U.S. Government, how can the public be assured the Supreme Court is not infiltrated by this as a fifth column?
This is one-half the conspiracy. If this matter is not vetted, the U.S. Senate is subject to charges of malfeasance and dereliction of duty. The editors know this. It is their job to see it gets pointed out.
Item - For the New York Times to cite “extremism” to discredit Alito (1.12.05 Editorial on-line), echoing the chant of others, based on the “evidence” of his extended membership in Concerned Alumni of Princeton and without going into the case they were trying to make, is a detestable smear. Is it assumed to have been wrong to favor ROTC, oppose co-education and affirmative action at Princeton in that context? Both Alito and the Times’ editors seem to agree. But unless and until someone takes the opportunity to educate and enlighten us, the public, on what the official morality is supposed to be around here, judging judges and elsewhere, what we could be witnessing is this system blowing itself up before our eyes.
The same factor Bush mentioned in the first item shows up as studiously neglected in the second. It is the religious factor, specifically, Judaism and Catholicism. The “extremism” charge against Alito is the rhetorical substitute for refusing to confront this powerful religious complex. But it must be done. It is as if a pact had been forged: “We will keep anti-Catholicism at bay if you will keep anti-Semitism away” or vice versa. Who is going to intervene in that lover’s quarrel? Not Gibson or Speilberg, I’ll bet.
Sid Thomas, Ph.D
2327 Seneca St., Binghamton, New York 1390
607 773 0071
posted by Sid Thomas | 11:26 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home