Sid Thomas S*-ing to Power

S*-ing to Power **** S is for Sign, * is for Use. S*, as in S*-ing, is for SLINGING THE SHLONG AGAINST PHILOSOPHICAL AND OTHER ABUSE (Let S* be verse, picture, symbology, rant, whatever talks eternal, American, now) The world is ready and waiting for what we can do here. As John Calvin put it, differently, "It's up to you."

My Photo
Name:
Location: Binghamton, New York, United States

This is an attempt to extend conversations begun over many years into the present, applying results of work in between to gain analytic method, continuity, scope, depth, vivacity and permanence

Saturday, October 14, 2006

THE DEVIL AND JUSTIN FRIEDMAN

THE DEVIL AND JUSTIN FRIEDMAN

Jewish Dirty Tricks and Republican Politics
(I want to show the linkage: the common template is reversal* --Jewish and "Gay")

******
Did Chavez' words cross the mind of Chenango Hall residents on the night the racist, anti-semitic griffiti was found? (September 18, '06) "Yesterday, the devil came here. Right here. And it smells of sulphur still today." Of course not. The Vezuelan president didn't speak in the UN until weeks later. But dates get lost in memory; in the unconscious there is no time; and for we who have been taught by Reagan to think "back to the future", the same sulphuric odor emenates from dormitory
and Ofal Office.

The tone of Fresident DeFleu's letter conveyed as much. "Hate or bias-motivated behaviors are viewed as an attack on the entire community and run counter to our principles and values", her letter said. "Explicit language, derogatory terms and swastikas directed against blacks and Jews (sic)", were the content scrawled on an RA assistant's door and 2 hall boards. ("The graffiti could be wiped off and caused no long-term damage," the report notes.) New York Governor George Pataki personally seconded that message. Not on his State's University precincts. The entire attacked community includes everyone affected by the psychic strain and tensions which such behaviors arouse.

A student named Justin Friedman, resident of the dorm, was reported October 6 to be "charged with fourth degree criminal mischief" in connection with the case. "No longer on campus...also no longer taking classes pending charges under the university's judicial system."

These are the sole documents in the public record concerning the incident to date. Satisfaction of grievance must be made on behalf of three classes of affectees: 1. On behalf of the community as a whole for assault on civility and order, responsibility for which falls on the University administration as expressed in the president's letter. 2. More particularly, on behalf of blacks and Jews, because they were singled out; responsibility for the satisfaction of which would presumably fall under the penalties the University's charges provide. It's hard to think such flimsy dissing is going to cause blacks and Jews much actual existential discomfort, though they would expect punishment.

3. But more particularly still, there is a third group injured by implication, namely the ostensible perpetrators': racists and anti-Semites. One does not have to sympathasize with racists and anti-semites to understand they are greatly aggreived by this act. It should come as no surprise that there are a growing number of good American individuals I know who have come to be proud to proclaim themselves one or the other or both. Neither KKK lynchers or Holocaust deniers; just white Christian -- straight male goes with that on the interface lines. If it was one of their own who did it, they would have brought shame and dishonor to this group. They are summoned on stage like stand-by pariahs; one of them has been caught exploding what they think, maybe mostly unconsciously -- hoping to make it become more so, perhaps -- in history's face. Increment in this defamation, bordering on menacing attitudes, is sown on the wind by this act's invasion of the space of group-communication (TokenSpace*grp). Spraying swastikas with hate signs in public deconstructs the higher, more sublimated social consciousness that existed before it occurred.

Unbeholden to and unproded by any organization of Nazi or KKK groups, I represent their cause in principle, in pursuing this one question: was this a Jewish Dirty Trick political stunt? It happened before, in '88 -- at least according to an Occams razor reading of that history. If Justin Freidman is a Jew who acted as a Jew to push America's Big RED BUTTONS, in order to stir up a ruccus that could be used for pro-Israel rallies, hurling condemnations against anti-war "extremists" (Cindy Sheehan, David Duke, Mearsheimer and Walt, Naom Chomsky and anti-Israel leftists in general, paleoconservatives, libertarians -- whoever opposes AIPAC, PNAC, AEI, and the Libby Lobby) ... if that is the case, responsibility for satisfying that grievance falls: first, on the court proceedings, not to cover it up by accepting a deal that avoids finding out whether Justin Friedman is Jew, and if so, what kind, and what motivated him to act.

The principles of justice calls for punishment prorportional to the crime. There is a gray area in law concerning hate crime hoaxes. They are in fact the Achilles heel of such legislation. The more hate hangs in the atmosphere, the more likely an attack will be faked. If people are ready to 'go off' anyway, a little nudge pushes them over the ede. What has not been recognized, but I will press here as attorney for the aggrieved group, is the "double sin", when the attack is self-inflicted and the hate blamed on a framed enemy. It requires something of a mental effort to bring the elements in this complex, but thoroughly 'logical', according to the template unfolded as a whole in consciousness. .

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home